Tuesday, October 18, 2016

Looking Back Having Finished Invisible Man


When Mr. Mitchell first assigned us Invisible Man at the start of the year, like other books we have read and analyzed in English classes at Uni, I hadn’t really heard of it before. The first week, we were assigned to start the book and read the prologue. After reading the prologue, I had a few initial reactions. Firstly, I saw the narrator as a somewhat odd and questionable character whose story seemed … interesting, to say the least. In my mind, over the course of the novel I imagined this character telling the reader about his life and how he got to where he was, or describing some specific period that had an impact on his life. And although I was right to assume this was the general outline of the story, I was completely unprepared for what Ellison had in mind.

The fact that Ellison filled his chapters with so much detail and metaphor was itself unexpected. Like we have discussed in class, each chapter seemed like a story on its own, and I had never really encountered this. I remember thinking to myself “Am I on the right chapter? Did I skip some pages? How did the scene change so fast?” Already my view of the novel was changing, and I had barely read a few chapters. Having finished the book, it makes sense why Ellison needed to describe each scene so quickly, since he wanted to cover the majority narrator’s life in one book. But I have realized that even though he did make each chapter so separated from the last, there was no detail lost and no idea left behind. Ellison managed to keep up with the ideas he was trying to convey while maintaining a steady description of the narrator’s life. We witnessed the development of the narrator’s quest to find his identity and discover his invisibility as well as his progress towards the version of himself we witnessed in the prologue. All of which being ideas that occurred throughout the entirety of the book. Additionally, as we finished the book, I realized how much commentary Ellison was able to include through the narrator’s own realizations. Of course after reading the prologue, I assumed there would be some deeper theme Ellison would portray, but the amount of detail and variety Ellison included in his social commentary was much greater than I had expected.

Looking back to the start of the book, I’m not sure what I pictured Ellison would do with the character of the narrator Invisible Man in terms of his discovery about life. I imagined the narrator having similar experiences to Bigger Thomas –in that the character was constantly finding new ideas to grapple with, specifically identity – or experiences very much in contrast to Bigger, since his character was portrayed as more intelligent and somewhat more logical in his actions. Either way, I have realized that Ellison went beyond the narrator’s own realizations and implied that these ideas were applicable to everyone (not just the narrator or a single individual), even in today’s society.
           


4 comments:

  1. I loved the storytelling skills the novel exhibits! It might be my favorite school book yet! I found the narrator's self-reflections a lot more natural than those of Bigger. Particularly since the narrator evolves to reflect the values of his subconscious, whereas with Bigger I saw recognition of his issues but no little change in behavior. To me, it was much more satisfying to read Invisible Man as the narrator really grew on me and his antics made the book very enjoyable.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think Invisible Man is a really good book to look back on because feelings in the moment can be very different from your feelings about things at the end. I feel like we are definitely on the narrator's side at the book but that might not have been true while reading certain parts of it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think the episodic narrative structure is actually really realistic considering the nature of the narrative. The narrator is looking back on a huge portion of his life and attempting to tell as much as he can. I think many of us would have trouble having a continuous flow throughout the retelling of our life. Rather, we see our life as being episodic, as being composed as several formative and distinct events. Ellison's Narrator is not unlike many of us.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The prologue seems very confusing and still isn't enough to prepare the reader for the wild ride that lies within the novel. I definitely agree with the confusion and separation between the chapters. The crazy difference between the paint factory chapter and the Clifton funeral march is absurd and the expertise of Ellison is clearly displayed when he ties these 2 chapters together and is capable of making valid and though provoking points.Yet it was fairly easy to read and in the grand scheme of things makes sense as a reflection of a life/discovery of invisibility .

    ReplyDelete